But does putting drug users in prison contribute to this worthy goal? Drug users exercise free will when they chose to use drugs; a person has the right to give up his or her own freedom. As a result, while the health and safety risks of cigarettes may be greater than those proven to accompany marijuana, one can buy cigarettes from a vending machine and but go to prison for smoking marijuana.
In both instances, the reader is treated to arguments that effectively undermine current drug policy. A rational legal system, according to Husak, demands a convincing, but as yet not forthcoming, explanation of why one pleasurable drug subjects users to the risk of imprisonment while the other is accommodated in restaurants.
Frey for Cambridge University Press, raises the seldom-asked philosophical question of the justification, if any, of imprisoning persons for drug offenses. Prohibition must be weighed against the loss of personal freedom. Thus, the federal government did have the right to regulate the ingestion of drugs.
A Government does not have the right to dictate them. Critics of the War on Drugs advocate the partial or complete decriminalization of illegal drugs, combined with a system of regulation, as happens with alcohol and prescription drugs.
Cigarettes come with warnings. It required sellers to obtain a license.
Were this principle applied to drug producers or distributors who faced imprisonment it seems that imprisonment could not be justified. Drugs deemed socially, religiously, medically or politically unfit for recreational use are frequently banned. Sadly, we as parents of sick children have to give some of these prescribed drugs to treat symptoms even more devastating.
Husak contends that punishing adults or youth, far from protecting youth, puts them at greater risk. The DEA said that a huge percentage of the heroin addiction starts with prescriptions. The easy availability of drugs would create new consumers rather than rescuing current ones.
The points of discord between Husak's and de Marneffe's positions are serious but not as telling as is their implicit agreement. David Bradford argued that this is a reflection of the ease of cannabis availability: Legalization would allow greater regulation.
In addition, some drugs aid relaxation, others increase energy and some promote spiritual enlightenment or literary and artistic creativity. If drugs are legalized, there will be more drug abuse.
Although the writer of this essay does not necessarily endorse the use of marijuana, s he agrees with the argument that it is politically-incorrect to outlaw it in the United States. But Marijuana does have side-effects.
Some even state that in a strictly regulated market, drug use may fall overall, by removing the marketing activities of the illegal drug industry. Medical evidence of marijuana's comparatively mild effects is presented and the report concludes that the negative impacts of marijuana's ban are far worse than those that would prevail if it were allowed to be sold openly and legally.
He begins his philosophical argument by clarifying the concepts and issues involved. For persons who worry about what drug decriminalization means for children, Husak counsels that there is more to fear from prosecution and conviction of youth for using drugs than there is to fear from the drugs themselves.
Thus, the federal government did have the right to regulate the ingestion of drugs. Legalizing drugs will send a message to children that drug use is acceptable. Sensibly regulating access will be part of any legitimate drug legalization policy, but locking up youth over drugs is just counter-productive.
The judicial system did not accept, at first, that being arrested in possession of drugs was a tax violation because it must have come from an unlicensed source because there were no licensesthereby avoiding taxes. Countries have a responsibility to respect individual free will and the right of self-determination.
If drugs were legalized, the companies that manufacture and market them would be sued, such as cigarette companies have been exposed to lawsuits. Husak here responds to de Marneffe's essay which focuses on potential drug abuse and promotes the welfare of children as a justification for keeping drug production and sale illegal.
Drug users exercise free will when they chose to use drugs; a person has the right to give up his or her own freedom. Rather, the best way to prevent youth drug abuse is through science-based educationand smart restrictions on access and advertising.
For another, he quotes a statistic showing that approximately four times as many persons die annually from using prescribed medicines than die from using illegal drugs.There's arguably no industry in the U.S. that's growing at a faster, more consistent pace than legal marijuana.
Marijuana Business Daily 's latest report, "Marijuana Business Factbook ," predicts legal sales growth in the U.S. of 30% this year, 45% inand % as an aggregate between and to about a $17 billion market. To advocate the legalization of drugs calls for a legal system in which the production and sale of drugs are not criminal offenses.
3) Criminalization of drugs makes the use of certain drugs a criminal offense, i.e. one deserving punishment. To argue for drug decriminalization, as Husak does, is not necessarily to argue for legalization of drugs. Husak entertains, but cautiously rejects the notion of a.
Argument and Criticism of the Argument for Legalizing Marijuana This 6 page report presents an essay that supports the legalization of marijuana in the United States. It then offers a critical analysis of that argument based on the rules and constraints of critical thinking and logic.
Teen marijuana use at the national level has fallen slightly sinceand their use of other illicit drugs has declined steadily. As of Feb.
26, marijuana was made legal in D.C.—sort of. When Gallup first asked Americans how they felt about marijuana inonly 12 percent of respondents favored the legalization of weed. That number has increased steadily with each passing decade, and in OctoberGallup reported that 50 percent of Americans favor the legalization of marijuana, the country’s most popular illicit drug.
Not only that, but the money is going to great causes – $ million goes right back to the taxpayers (rewarding those who voted for legalization), and the rest goes towards youth marijuana.Download